US moves to strengthen forces in Middle East to counter Iran
The US will send hundreds of additional troops and a dozen fighter jets to the Middle East in the coming weeks to counter what the Pentagon said is an escalating campaign by Iran to plan attacks against the US and its interests in the region. And for the first time, Pentagon officials on
Friday publicly blamed Iran and its proxies for recent tanker bombings near
United Arab Emirates and a rocket attack in Iraq.
President Donald Trump told reporters Friday that the 1,500
troops would have a “mostly protective” role as part of a build-up that began
this month in response to what the US said was a threat from Iran.
The announcement caps three weeks of elevated tensions with
Iran, as the administration hurled accusations of an imminent attack and
abruptly deployed Navy warships to the region. The moves alarmed members of
Congress, who demanded proof and details, amid fears the US was lurching toward
open conflict with Iran.
Adding to the uncertainty, Trump alternated between tough
talk toward Iran and a more conciliatory message, insisting he is open to
negotiations with Iran.
On Friday he seemed to downplay the prospect of conflict
when he spoke at the White House.
“Right now, I don’t think Iran wants to fight and I
certainly don’t think they want to fight with us,” he said.
In a related move, the Trump administration on Friday used
an emergency legal loophole to move ahead with the sale of $7 billion in
precision-guided munitions and other military support to Saudi Arabia, citing
threats the kingdom faces from Iran.
Vice Admiral Michael Gilday told Pentagon reporters that the
US has “very high confidence” that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard was responsible
for the explosions on four tankers, and that Iranian proxies in Iraq fired
rockets into Baghdad. He said Iran also tried to deploy modified small boats
that were capable of launching cruise missiles.
The deployments announced Friday include a squadron of 12
fighter jets, manned and unmanned surveillance aircraft, and a number of
military engineers to beef up protection for forces. In addition a battalion of
four Patriot missile batteries that was scheduled to leave the Middle East has
been ordered to stay. The total number of troops involved is about 1,500, with
roughly 600 included in the Patriot battalion. None of those troops will go to
either Iraq or Syria.
“We are going to be sending a relatively small number of
troops, mostly protective,” the president said at the White House before
setting off on a trip to Japan. “Some very talented people are going to the
Middle East right now and we’ll see what happens.”
Briefing reporters at the Pentagon, Gilday, the Joint Staff
director, did not provide direct evidence to back up claims tying Iran to the
attacks. He told reporters the conclusions were based on intelligence and
evidence gathered in the region, and officials said they are trying to
declassify some of the information so that it could be made public.
“This is truly operations driven by intelligence,” Gilday
said, adding that the US continues to see intelligence suggesting that Iran is
actively planning attacks against the US and partners in the region by the
Revolutionary Guard and Iranian proxies in Yemen and Iraq.
When pressed for proof of Iran’s involvement, he said the
mines used in the tanker attacks were attributed directly to the Revolutionary
Guard and he said threats could be traced back to senior leaders in Iran.
“I’m not reverse engineering this,” he said. “The Iranians
have said publicly they were going to do things. We learn more through
intelligence reporting. They have acted upon those threats and they’ve actually
attacked.”
The announcement of additional forces was met with mixed
reviews.
The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Democrat
Adam Smith of Washington, called the build-up “unsettling.”
“Leaders from both sides of the aisle have called for
de-escalation. At first blush, this move does not fit the bill,” Smith said in
a statement Friday. “Without a clearly articulated strategy, adding more
personnel and mission systems seems unwise, and appears to be a blatant and
heavy-handed move to further escalate tensions with Iran.”
The senior Republican on the committee, Mac Thornberry of
Texas, called it “a prudent step to protect our forces and deter Iran,” and
said requests from commanders should “never be subject to a partisan debate.”
The administration notified Congress earlier in the day
about the troop plans.
Gilday and Katie Wheelbarger, the acting assistant defense
secretary for international affairs, said the mission is strictly defensive,
and is not designed to provoke Iran into carrying out additional attacks. They
said the Pentagon will continue to evaluate the number of troops in the region
in case more are needed later.
Earlier this week, officials said military planners had
outlined options that could have sent up to 10,000 military reinforcements to
the region. Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan later said planners
hadn’t settled on a figure.
The US has about 70,000 troops across the Middle East,
including at a major Navy base in Bahrain and an Air Force base and operations
center in Qatar. There are about 5,200 troops in Iraq and 2,000 in Syria.
Earlier this month, the US sent thousands more into the
region around Iran, including an aircraft carrier strike group, four bomber
aircraft, a Patriot missile battery and fighter jets.
Tension had been rising with Iran for more than a year. The
Trump administration withdrew last year from the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran
and world powers and reinstated American sanctions that have badly damaged the
Iranian economy.
The president has argued that the nuclear deal failed to
sufficiently curb Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons or halt its support
for militias throughout the Middle East that the US argues destabilize the
region.